AcmeForMusi©







WE ARE PASSIONATE YOUNG PROFESSIONALS WHO DEEPLY LOVES MUSIC.

OUR AIM IS TO STRIVE TO FIND NEW SOLUTIONS TO HELP ARTISTS MAKE A LIVING OUT OF IT.

ACME FOR MUSIC IS A NETWORK/FACTORY OF YOUNG FREELANCE CREATIVE PROFESSIONALS WITH DIFFERENT BACKGROUNDS IN MUSIC INDUSTRY, COMMITTED TO ONE AIM: PROMOTING GOOD MUSIC.

THIS IS NOT MERELY ABOUT PRODUCT SELLING, THIS IS ABOUT ART, CONVEYING MESSAGES, PROMOTING IDEAS AND NEW WAYS TO GET THE AUDIENCE NOTICE.
THAT'S THE ERA OF DIY AND NEW MEANS OF PROMOTION KEEP CROPPING UP.

WE REALIZE FOR EMERGENT BANDS, LABELS AND FESTIVAL SOCIAL MEDIA AND VIRAL CAMPAIGN, BEING SURE THAT THIS IS NO TIME FOR RELYING ON ONE STANDARD WAY OF LAUNCHING AND PROMOTING A BAND

THEREFORE WE AND OUR PARTNERS ARE CONSTANTLY BRAINSTORMING FOR NEW AND STIMULATING IDEAS, IN ORDER TO OFFER A RANGE OF CUTTING-EDGE CONSULTANCY SERVICES TO BANDS, LABELS AND FESTIVALS.
IN 2009 WE STARTED OUR ADVENTURE IN MUSIC INDUSTRY BIZ AS FREELANCE AND OWNER OF ACME FOR MUSIC (COMMUNICATION AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY), ATTENDING SOME OF THE MOST IMPORTANT INTERNATIONAL MUSIC EVENTS AND MEETING (FROM MIDEM, TO POPKOMM…) TO GET IN TOUCH WITH MUSIC BUSINESS PROFESSIONALS IN ORDER TO EXCHANGE IDEAS AND PROMOTE HIS BANDS.

OUR ARTISTS IN THEIR TURN CONTRIBUTE TO OUR WORK BY COVERING PART OF THE EXPENSES REQUIRED FOR US TO ATTEND SUCH EVENTS.



° ABOUT US:
WE ARE GRAPHIC DESIGNERS, WEB DESIGNERS, DIRECTORS AND PHOTOGRAPHERS AND WE’LL HELP ANY BAND PROVIDE THE PERFECT PRESENTATION TO THE WORLD TO BE ENHANCED BY AN EFFECTIVE PR CAMPAIGN.

WE ALSO ARE PR PROFESSIONALS, EVENT ORGANIZERS AND PRESS AGENTS AND WE’LL ORGANIZE AND PROMOTE EXCLUSIVE EVENTS AND GIGS TO HELP YOU GET YOUR MESSAGE ACROSS.

WE WORK TO TIMELINES AND PROVIDE OUR CLIENTS WITH CONSTANT AND DETAILED REPORTS ON THE STATE OF THE CAMPAIGN AND WITH TRAINING TUTORIALS ON HOW TO KEEP IT GOING ON THEIR OWN.



° SPECIALTIES:
ACCORDING TO OUR CLIENTS’ SPECIFIC NEEDS OUR CAMPAIGN CAN LAST 3 TO 12 MONTHS, ALWAYS GRANTING THE MAXIMUM MEDIA EXPOSURE.
CROUDSOURCING IS OUR WAY OF BRAINSTORMING TO REALIZE SOCIAL MEDIA MARKETING STRATEGIES, AND MANY MORE.

° BRAINSTORMING OPENSOURCE°

° FIRST STEP (BAND) MANAGEMENT°

° VIRAL VIDEOS & SOCIAL MEDIA STRATEGIES°

° DIGITAL DISTRIBUTION CONSULTING°

° GRAPHIC DESIGN°
FOLLOW THIS TUMBLR BLOG TO STAY UPDATED!



Photobucket       Photobucket       Photobucket       Photobucket

Photobucket                           Photobucket       Photobucket       Photobucket       Photobucket                                                                                                                             
  1. Iceland’s On-going Revolution 
by Deena Stryker
An Italian radio program’s story about Iceland’s on-going revolution  is a stunning example of how little our media tells us about the rest of  the world. Americans may remember that at the start of the 2008  financial crisis, Iceland literally went bankrupt.  The reasons were  mentioned only in passing, and since then, this little-known member of  the European Union fell back into oblivion.
As one European country after another fails or risks failing,  imperiling the Euro, with repercussions for the entire world, the last  thing the powers that be want is for Iceland to become an example.  Here’s why:
Five years of a pure neo-liberal regime had made Iceland, (population  320 thousand, no army), one of the richest countries in the world. In  2003 all the country’s banks were privatized, and in an effort to  attract foreign investors, they offered on-line banking whose minimal  costs allowed them to offer relatively high rates of return. The  accounts, called IceSave, attracted many English and Dutch small  investors.  But as investments grew, so did the banks’ foreign debt.  In  2003 Iceland’s debt was equal to 200 times its GNP, but in 2007, it was  900 percent.  The 2008 world financial crisis was the coup de grace.  The three main Icelandic banks, Landbanki, Kapthing and Glitnir, went  belly up and were nationalized, while the Kroner lost 85% of its value  with respect to the Euro.  At the end of the year Iceland declared  bankruptcy.
Contrary to what could be expected, the crisis resulted in Icelanders  recovering their sovereign rights, through a process of direct  participatory democracy that eventually led to a new Constitution.  But  only after much pain.
Geir Haarde, the Prime Minister of a Social Democratic coalition  government, negotiated a two million one hundred thousand dollar loan,  to which the Nordic countries added another two and a half million. But  the foreign financial community pressured Iceland to impose drastic  measures.  The FMI and the European Union wanted to take over its debt,  claiming this was the only way for the country to pay back Holland and  Great Britain, who had promised to reimburse their citizens.
Protests and riots continued, eventually forcing the government to  resign. Elections were brought forward to April 2009, resulting in a  left-wing coalition which condemned the neoliberal economic system, but  immediately gave in to its demands that Iceland pay off a total of three  and a half million Euros.  This required each Icelandic citizen to pay  100 Euros a month (or about $130) for fifteen years, at 5.5% interest,  to pay off a debt incurred by private parties vis a vis other private  parties. It was the straw that broke the reindeer’s back.
What happened next was extraordinary. The belief that citizens had to  pay for the mistakes of a financial monopoly, that an entire nation  must be taxed to pay off private debts was shattered, transforming the  relationship between citizens and their political institutions and  eventually driving Iceland’s leaders to the side of their constituents.  The Head of State, Olafur Ragnar Grimsson, refused to ratify the law  that would have made Iceland’s citizens responsible for its bankers’  debts, and accepted calls for a referendum.
Of course the international community only increased the pressure on  Iceland. Great Britain and Holland threatened dire reprisals that would  isolate the country.  As Icelanders went to vote, foreign bankers  threatened to block any aid from the IMF.  The British government  threatened to freeze Icelander savings and checking accounts. As  Grimsson said: “We were told that if we refused the international  community’s conditions, we would become the Cuba of the North.  But if  we had accepted, we would have become the Haiti of the North.” (How many  times have I written that when Cubans see the dire state of their  neighbor, Haiti, they count themselves lucky.)
In the March 2010 referendum, 93% voted against repayment of the  debt.  The IMF immediately froze its loan.  But the revolution (though  not televised in the United States), would not be intimidated. With the  support of a furious citizenry, the government launched civil and penal  investigations into those responsible for the financial crisis.   Interpol put out an international arrest warrant for the ex-president  of Kaupthing, Sigurdur Einarsson, as the other bankers implicated in the  crash fled the country.
But Icelanders didn’t stop there: they decided to draft a new  constitution that would free the country from the exaggerated power of  international finance and virtual money.  (The one in use had been  written when Iceland gained its independence from Denmark, in 1918, the  only difference with the Danish constitution being that the word  ‘president’ replaced the word ‘king’.)
To write the new constitution, the people of Iceland elected  twenty-five citizens from among 522 adults not belonging to any  political party but recommended by at least thirty citizens. This  document was not the work of a handful of politicians, but was written  on the internet. The constituent’s meetings are streamed on-line, and  citizens can send their comments and suggestions, witnessing the  document as it takes shape. The constitution that eventually emerges  from this participatory democratic process will be submitted to  parliament for approval after the next elections.
Some readers will remember that Iceland’s ninth century agrarian  collapse was featured in Jared Diamond’s book by the same name. Today,  that country is recovering from its financial collapse in ways just the  opposite of those generally considered unavoidable, as confirmed  yesterday by the new head of the IMF, Christine Lagarde to Fareed  Zakaria. The people of Greece have been told that the privatization of  their public sector is the only solution.  And those of Italy, Spain and  Portugal are facing the same threat.
They should look to Iceland. Refusing to bow to foreign interests,  that small country stated loud and clear that the people are sovereign.      
That’s why it is not in the news anymore.
Originally posted to Deena Stryker on Mon Aug 01, 2011 at 08:47 AM PDT.

    Iceland’s On-going Revolution 

    by Deena Stryker

    An Italian radio program’s story about Iceland’s on-going revolution is a stunning example of how little our media tells us about the rest of the world. Americans may remember that at the start of the 2008 financial crisis, Iceland literally went bankrupt.  The reasons were mentioned only in passing, and since then, this little-known member of the European Union fell back into oblivion.

    As one European country after another fails or risks failing, imperiling the Euro, with repercussions for the entire world, the last thing the powers that be want is for Iceland to become an example. Here’s why:

    Five years of a pure neo-liberal regime had made Iceland, (population 320 thousand, no army), one of the richest countries in the world. In 2003 all the country’s banks were privatized, and in an effort to attract foreign investors, they offered on-line banking whose minimal costs allowed them to offer relatively high rates of return. The accounts, called IceSave, attracted many English and Dutch small investors.  But as investments grew, so did the banks’ foreign debt.  In 2003 Iceland’s debt was equal to 200 times its GNP, but in 2007, it was 900 percent.  The 2008 world financial crisis was the coup de grace. The three main Icelandic banks, Landbanki, Kapthing and Glitnir, went belly up and were nationalized, while the Kroner lost 85% of its value with respect to the Euro.  At the end of the year Iceland declared bankruptcy.

    Contrary to what could be expected, the crisis resulted in Icelanders recovering their sovereign rights, through a process of direct participatory democracy that eventually led to a new Constitution.  But only after much pain.

    Geir Haarde, the Prime Minister of a Social Democratic coalition government, negotiated a two million one hundred thousand dollar loan, to which the Nordic countries added another two and a half million. But the foreign financial community pressured Iceland to impose drastic measures.  The FMI and the European Union wanted to take over its debt, claiming this was the only way for the country to pay back Holland and Great Britain, who had promised to reimburse their citizens.

    Protests and riots continued, eventually forcing the government to resign. Elections were brought forward to April 2009, resulting in a left-wing coalition which condemned the neoliberal economic system, but immediately gave in to its demands that Iceland pay off a total of three and a half million Euros.  This required each Icelandic citizen to pay 100 Euros a month (or about $130) for fifteen years, at 5.5% interest, to pay off a debt incurred by private parties vis a vis other private parties. It was the straw that broke the reindeer’s back.

    What happened next was extraordinary. The belief that citizens had to pay for the mistakes of a financial monopoly, that an entire nation must be taxed to pay off private debts was shattered, transforming the relationship between citizens and their political institutions and eventually driving Iceland’s leaders to the side of their constituents. The Head of State, Olafur Ragnar Grimsson, refused to ratify the law that would have made Iceland’s citizens responsible for its bankers’ debts, and accepted calls for a referendum.

    Of course the international community only increased the pressure on Iceland. Great Britain and Holland threatened dire reprisals that would isolate the country.  As Icelanders went to vote, foreign bankers threatened to block any aid from the IMF.  The British government threatened to freeze Icelander savings and checking accounts. As Grimsson said: “We were told that if we refused the international community’s conditions, we would become the Cuba of the North.  But if we had accepted, we would have become the Haiti of the North.” (How many times have I written that when Cubans see the dire state of their neighbor, Haiti, they count themselves lucky.)

    In the March 2010 referendum, 93% voted against repayment of the debt.  The IMF immediately froze its loan.  But the revolution (though not televised in the United States), would not be intimidated. With the support of a furious citizenry, the government launched civil and penal investigations into those responsible for the financial crisis.  Interpol put out an international arrest warrant for the ex-president of Kaupthing, Sigurdur Einarsson, as the other bankers implicated in the crash fled the country.

    But Icelanders didn’t stop there: they decided to draft a new constitution that would free the country from the exaggerated power of international finance and virtual money.  (The one in use had been written when Iceland gained its independence from Denmark, in 1918, the only difference with the Danish constitution being that the word ‘president’ replaced the word ‘king’.)

    To write the new constitution, the people of Iceland elected twenty-five citizens from among 522 adults not belonging to any political party but recommended by at least thirty citizens. This document was not the work of a handful of politicians, but was written on the internet. The constituent’s meetings are streamed on-line, and citizens can send their comments and suggestions, witnessing the document as it takes shape. The constitution that eventually emerges from this participatory democratic process will be submitted to parliament for approval after the next elections.

    Some readers will remember that Iceland’s ninth century agrarian collapse was featured in Jared Diamond’s book by the same name. Today, that country is recovering from its financial collapse in ways just the opposite of those generally considered unavoidable, as confirmed yesterday by the new head of the IMF, Christine Lagarde to Fareed Zakaria. The people of Greece have been told that the privatization of their public sector is the only solution.  And those of Italy, Spain and Portugal are facing the same threat.

    They should look to Iceland. Refusing to bow to foreign interests, that small country stated loud and clear that the people are sovereign.     

    That’s why it is not in the news anymore.

    Originally posted to Deena Stryker on Mon Aug 01, 2011 at 08:47 AM PDT.


    2
    1. peter-punk said: in the meanwhile they have passed laws that lets them censor any newspaper and got in debt with russia and other banks. Don’t forget that Iceland is a country in a geographical sense only — 120,000 people with free energy can do things we cant.
    2. acmeformusic posted this
  2.